WINDOWS VISTA AERO VS LINUX UBUNTU BERYL
Uploaded by: tearbd2
Video Description:
WINDOWS VS LINUX
the song:HERE COME THE HOTSTTEPER.
Tags for this video: 3D AERO BERYL DESKTOP LINUX MICROSOFT SOFTWARE UBUNTU VISTA WINDOWS XGL
Find more videos in the "Entertainment" category
See more videos uploaded by tearbd2
| My Ubuntu Beryl Matrix 3D Desktop | Vista install in 2 minutes | Windows 95 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Ubuntu 8.04 & Compiz | Vista vs Ubuntu | Beryl Ubuntu Desktop |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide














Links me to version for it?
Linux hardly has any programs that are capatible; only programs such as Firefox
are capatible. I go with Vista.
Don't know if it's that much difference, but OO is catching up and getting better.
because he is one of the best football
freestyler in his age on this world!!!
And I have been using solely Ubuntu for over a year and have yet to find compatibility issues. Almost all programs from Microsoft are available in an open-source format for free, and there is a built-in system to download them.
There are only problems playing newer games, but I have been happy with the older ones I have and the open-source ones I downloaded.
because he is one of the best football
freestyler in his age on this world!!!
I have no complaints so far, it takes a little while to get used to the Heightened Security of Linux Ubuntu -you have to authorize installations and such- though there's no virus problems so far
Quit Windows. Years ago, linux was not usable, now it is working.
It would seem like Ubuntu is using more processor time than Vista, since it looks just as good/better, but since its optimized better, its actually using far less.
I'm not saying Linux is the ultimate solution. It isn't... yet. If however you know more than a little about computers, and don't mind learning command line operation, Linux is very efficient.
Help me please...