this man speaks the ...( 2 years ago by raider8916)
this man speaks the truth, these teams are equal. A rematch is in hand. I don't think USC deserves to play Ohio State simply because they can't beat them.
It's not fair for ...( 2 years ago by TroySmithOwns10)
It's not fair for OSU to beat a team twice. Michigan had their chance at OSU. Too bad for them
If they're "equal" ...( 2 years ago by sovocol42)
If they're "equal" why did OSU beat them??? They are not "equal"...OSU is the better team plain and simple. Let's see if Michigan can handle USC!!!
Not even, we turned ...( 2 years ago by JogaOhio)
Not even, we turned the ball over 3 times, and Michigan got a few very generous calls in their favor to keep their drives alive. Those things hadn't happened it would be a totally different game.
Yup 3 turnovers, ...( 2 years ago by sjlahn)
Yup 3 turnovers, none of which caused by Michigan. Without them this is at least a 2 score margin, maybe even 3. Mr. Littal is off on this one, this game was not as close as the score would show.
this guy has no ...( 2 years ago by williamfrench)
this guy has no idea what he is talking about. OSU controlled the game. There was only one chance in the game for UM to take the lead. They went 3 and out in that series.
that makes no sense ...( 2 years ago by woodke1235)
that makes no sense when Michigan would've clearly won if it wasn't for that Personal foul on Shaun Crable but the USC game did proove that Michigan does not deserve to have a rematch
"Michigan would ...( 2 years ago by williamfrench)
"Michigan would have clearly won"? That's just silly. There is no basis for that statement. OSU had not been stopped the whole game with exception of it's own errors. Nothing about that game leads one to believe Michigan "would have won". they were trailing. Woulda could shoulda, but they didn't. Use some logic. You can't just pick out one play and say "but if". That's simply illogical. "Clearly" LMAO.
ok, the score was ...( 1 year ago by kman618)
ok, the score was 42-39, it was kinda close. but still, usc does NOT deserve to play osu
but the USC game did proove that Michigan does not deserve to have a rematch
That's just silly. There is no basis for that statement. OSU had not been stopped the whole game with exception of it's own errors. Nothing about that game leads one to believe Michigan "would have won". they were trailing.
Woulda could shoulda, but they didn't. Use some logic. You can't just pick out one play and say "but if". That's simply illogical.
"Clearly" LMAO.