Science, evolution, and creation: Ali G vs Kent Hovind
Uploaded by: g12er
Video Description:
Leave your comments at the longer version of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcaaJA6mDWE
==Video description:==
Da Ali G Show does science. Ali G (Sasha Baron-Cohen) invited (now federal inmate and tax cheat) creationist Kent Hovind to discuss evolution. The show erroneously lists Hovind as a "Dr," but his "doctorate" was earned from an unaccredited diploma mill. For more Hovind videos look at ones made by http://youtube.com/ExtantDodo and for answers to Hovind's misinformation see: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind/
==Youtube controversy:==
Eric Hovind [Kent's son] has been using false copyright claims to get youtube to pull negative material.
I guess Hovind's son has gotten tired of Kent Hovind's lies getting exposed on YouTube. So his son lied and claimed he owns the copyright on videos in an effort to silence his critics:
http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/news/2007/09/youtube_dmca
==Convicted felon==
Read about Hovind's 58 felony convictions:
http://www.ncseweb.org/news/2007/01/kent-hovind-sentenced-to-ten-years-001062
==Audio of Hovind lying in jail==
Listen to the Kent Hovind jail recordings played at his sentencing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9O7MxW4htxo
This one in particular has Eric Hovind plot with Kent to hide assets from the government:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HQTgn06WslE
==Comments==
Comments are closed since no one is offering anything new.
Tags for this video: AliG Baron-Cohen Borat creationism design Dino Dr Eric evolution Hovind intelligent Kent Sasha science skepticism
Find more videos in the "Comedy" category
See more videos uploaded by g12er
| ali g harvard speach part 1 | Ali G Terrorrorist rofl so funny!!!!! | Ali G - sandwich war |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Ali G- Treehuggers | Ali G - Buzz Aldrin | Ali G - War |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide














But let's say they aren't forgeries, those writings were written decades and in some case centuries after Christ lived.
So you are where we began: me asking for evidence. You don't have to have evidence though since "faith" is believing in something without proof.
That is why fundamentalists ignore an entire academic discipline- science- in order to believe.
So you just ignored the evidence. Show that he wasn't "a Christian." What sources do you have? Where in his writings/speeches does he say that?
So you ignored all his references to the Bible and his background.
"For these and many other reasons i don't judge him as a religious person."
You gave vague assertions that could be true of anyone who says their are religious. What evidence do you have to overlook all his speeches/writings and religious background?
Quoting g12er:
"Your misunderstanding in other people's beliefs does not interest me."
"You are ignorant about science."
"...Judging from your spelling you are probably a child."
COME ON. (all unnecessary things to say)
Kent Hovind, a creep & fraud of the 1st rank, is now rotting in jail.
good on you, ali-boy!!
I admit i haven't heard many of his speeches and articles but to say that he was a fair Christian... In Bible you can find anything you want. To deny religion would have ment to lose support of a number of people. Also Hitler made a constant pressure on Church - he tried to get a privilegue to appoint his own bishops in Germany, to keep Vatican silent about his jobs...
The Nazis tagreted atheists for persecution.
I am not saying Hitler's religion drove him to murder, but simply refuting the false claim that he was an atheist.
Though keep in mind the origins of modern anti-semitism is from Christians.
OK, so you are saying whenever a Christian does something bad they aren't a "real Christian." Seems like a weasel way out of it.
Hitler was not an atheist. Hitler believed in God and cited the Bible. If you want to say being a bad person makes him "unChristian" then you have to ignore his actual religious beliefs.
You want history to back up a reason for your faith. But history, as I have shown isn't as supportive of your beliefs.
And you have "faith" (religion) so you don't care about facts, which is what you just proved.
If anyone wants to talk about science or history then they should take the time to learn about it.
You shouldn't criticize a whole body of facts if you know nothing about it.
Exactly.
(cont.)
Spent over $10,000 trying to avoid a $50 building permit
He thinks 9/11 was a conspiracy
He thinks Laetrile is a cure for cancer but the government is withholding the secret from the public
Thinks many other diseases were engineered by money makers
He is a convicted felon, and here is one of the excuses he tried to justify his tax evasion. He claimed everything he owned really belonged to God